If you’re going to spend 50 minutes of your life online, do it watching this (by lessig)
“What made blogs so immediately popular, both with readers and with writers, was the very fact that they changed and developed over time, existing not as a static, complete text but rather as an ongoing series of updates, additions, and revisions. This is of course to be expected of a journal-like format, and might easily be compared to any form of periodical or serial publication; the blog as a whole remains relatively constant, even as new ‘issues’ or posts are added to it. But the fact that a blog’s readers return again and again in order to find those new posts might encourage us to ask whether there is something in the structure of digital authorship that privileges and encourages development and change, even beyond the obviously diachronic aspect of the blog’s structure. When web pages are not regularly updated and attended to, after all, they’re subject to rapid degeneration: aging styles, outdated standards, and worst, perhaps, ‘link rot.’ Such ephemerality makes it arguable that the unspoken contract between the author and the reader of a piece of digital text is radically different from that between the author of a book and its reader; rather than assuming that the text is fixed, complete, and stable, the reader of a digital text may well assume otherwise. As Clifford Lynch suggests, we do not yet fully understand what ‘reader expectations about updating published work’ will be (Lynch, 2001); will the assumption come to be that a text must be up-to-date, with all known errors corrected, reflecting new information as it comes to light, in order to maintain the ‘authority’ that print has held? Sites such as Wikipedia seem to indicate a growing assumption that digitally published texts not only will but should change over time. Digital text is, above all else, malleable, and the relationship between the reader and the text reflects that malleability; there is little sense in attempting to replicate the permanence of print in a medium whose chief value is change.”
Kathleen Fitzpatrick, “The Digital Future of Authorship: Rethinking Originality.” Culture Machine Vol. 12, 2011:11
Media Policy Project Policy Brief 1: Creative Destruction and Copyright Protection | LSE Media Policy Project
The music industry and artists should innovate and actively reconnect with their sharing fans rather than treat them as criminals.
Hypothetical You Say?
‘Can the Subaltern Tweet?’ may be a wonderful title for an essay, but…it is now someone else’s…
Nonny de la Peña on “Gone Gitmo,” Stroome and the future of interactive storytelling – Nieman Storyboard -
My first post of the year…
UCL Centre for Digital Humanities » Blog Archive » HASTAC Scholars Program
Clairey Ross and I co-wrote a remixed version of the posts we had written originally for each of our blogs, and this is what came out. It was quick and fun and online! :) Thank you, Clairey, and thank you, UCLDH.
